๐Ÿ“Š Cost of Living Comparison

Chicago vs San Francisco

Side-by-side cost of living comparison for 2026

Chicago

Illinois
107
Above Average
$310,000
Median Home
$1,700/mo
Median Rent
$62,097
Median Income

San Francisco

California
190
Very Expensive
$1,200,000
Median Home
$3,400/mo
Median Rent
$119,136
Median Income

๐Ÿ’ก The Verdict

44% cheaper
Chicago is 44% more affordable than San Francisco. A $75,000 salary in San Francisco is equivalent to $42,237 in Chicago.

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values shown. National average = 100. Lower is cheaper.

Housing
112
Chicago
327
San Francisc
Groceries
104
Chicago
112
San Francisc
Utilities
100
Chicago
126
San Francisc
Transportation
116
Chicago
113
San Francisc
Healthcare
101
Chicago
113
San Francisc

๐Ÿ’ฐ Salary Equivalence

To maintain the same standard of living:

$133,178
$75K in Chicago โ†’ San Francisco
$42,237
$75K in San Francisco โ†’ Chicago

See exact take-home pay: Illinois salaries ยท California salaries

Living in Chicago vs San Francisco

Housing is typically the biggest factor in any cost-of-living comparison. Chicago has a housing index of 112 while San Francisco sits at 327 (national average = 100). The median home in Chicago costs $310,000 compared to $1,200,000 in San Francisco, a difference of $890,000. Monthly rent follows a similar pattern: $1,700 in Chicago versus $3,400 in San Francisco.

Groceries and everyday expenses show a notable difference: Chicago scores 104 while San Francisco scores 112.

Healthcare costs in Chicago (101) are lower than San Francisco (113).

Median household income in Chicago is $62,097 compared to $119,136 in San Francisco. When adjusted for cost of living, income goes further in Chicago.

๐Ÿ”— Related Tools

๐Ÿ“š Moving & Relocation Resources

Moving Planners โ†’Finance Books โ†’Budget Planners โ†’

Amazon affiliate links