๐Ÿ“Š Cost of Living Comparison

Las Vegas vs San Francisco

Side-by-side cost of living comparison for 2026

Las Vegas

Nevada
101
Average
$350,000
Median Home
$1,400/mo
Median Rent
$56,415
Median Income

San Francisco

California
190
Very Expensive
$1,200,000
Median Home
$3,400/mo
Median Rent
$119,136
Median Income

๐Ÿ’ก The Verdict

47% cheaper
Las Vegas is 47% more affordable than San Francisco. A $75,000 salary in San Francisco is equivalent to $39,868 in Las Vegas.

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values shown. National average = 100. Lower is cheaper.

Housing
106
Las Vegas
327
San Francisc
Groceries
101
Las Vegas
112
San Francisc
Utilities
94
Las Vegas
126
San Francisc
Transportation
107
Las Vegas
113
San Francisc
Healthcare
96
Las Vegas
113
San Francisc

๐Ÿ’ฐ Salary Equivalence

To maintain the same standard of living:

$141,089
$75K in Las Vegas โ†’ San Francisco
$39,868
$75K in San Francisco โ†’ Las Vegas

See exact take-home pay: Nevada salaries ยท California salaries

Living in Las Vegas vs San Francisco

Housing is typically the biggest factor in any cost-of-living comparison. Las Vegas has a housing index of 106 while San Francisco sits at 327 (national average = 100). The median home in Las Vegas costs $350,000 compared to $1,200,000 in San Francisco, a difference of $850,000. Monthly rent follows a similar pattern: $1,400 in Las Vegas versus $3,400 in San Francisco.

Groceries and everyday expenses show a notable difference: Las Vegas scores 101 while San Francisco scores 112.

Healthcare costs in Las Vegas (96) are lower than San Francisco (113).

Median household income in Las Vegas is $56,415 compared to $119,136 in San Francisco. When adjusted for cost of living, income goes further in Las Vegas.

๐Ÿ”— Related Tools

๐Ÿ“š Moving & Relocation Resources

Moving Planners โ†’Finance Books โ†’Budget Planners โ†’

Amazon affiliate links