๐Ÿ“Š Cost of Living Comparison

Little Rock vs San Francisco

Side-by-side cost of living comparison for 2026

Little Rock

Arkansas
84
Very Affordable
$170,000
Median Home
$950/mo
Median Rent
$47,638
Median Income

San Francisco

California
190
Very Expensive
$1,200,000
Median Home
$3,400/mo
Median Rent
$119,136
Median Income

๐Ÿ’ก The Verdict

56% cheaper
Little Rock is 56% more affordable than San Francisco. A $75,000 salary in San Francisco is equivalent to $33,158 in Little Rock.

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values shown. National average = 100. Lower is cheaper.

Housing
62
Little Rock
327
San Francisc
Groceries
94
Little Rock
112
San Francisc
Utilities
88
Little Rock
126
San Francisc
Transportation
98
Little Rock
113
San Francisc
Healthcare
90
Little Rock
113
San Francisc

๐Ÿ’ฐ Salary Equivalence

To maintain the same standard of living:

$169,643
$75K in Little Rock โ†’ San Francisco
$33,158
$75K in San Francisco โ†’ Little Rock

See exact take-home pay: Arkansas salaries ยท California salaries

Living in Little Rock vs San Francisco

Housing is typically the biggest factor in any cost-of-living comparison. Little Rock has a housing index of 62 while San Francisco sits at 327 (national average = 100). The median home in Little Rock costs $170,000 compared to $1,200,000 in San Francisco, a difference of $1,030,000. Monthly rent follows a similar pattern: $950 in Little Rock versus $3,400 in San Francisco.

Groceries and everyday expenses show a notable difference: Little Rock scores 94 while San Francisco scores 112.

Healthcare costs in Little Rock (90) are lower than San Francisco (113).

Median household income in Little Rock is $47,638 compared to $119,136 in San Francisco. When adjusted for cost of living, income goes further in Little Rock.

๐Ÿ”— Related Tools

๐Ÿ“š Moving & Relocation Resources

Moving Planners โ†’Finance Books โ†’Budget Planners โ†’

Amazon affiliate links