๐Ÿ“Š Cost of Living Comparison

Los Angeles vs San Francisco

Side-by-side cost of living comparison for 2026

Los Angeles

California
166
Very Expensive
$850,000
Median Home
$2,700/mo
Median Rent
$65,290
Median Income

San Francisco

California
190
Very Expensive
$1,200,000
Median Home
$3,400/mo
Median Rent
$119,136
Median Income

๐Ÿ’ก The Verdict

13% cheaper
Los Angeles is 13% more affordable than San Francisco. A $75,000 salary in San Francisco is equivalent to $65,526 in Los Angeles.

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values shown. National average = 100. Lower is cheaper.

Housing
262
Los Angeles
327
San Francisc
Groceries
107
Los Angeles
112
San Francisc
Utilities
114
Los Angeles
126
San Francisc
Transportation
118
Los Angeles
113
San Francisc
Healthcare
103
Los Angeles
113
San Francisc

๐Ÿ’ฐ Salary Equivalence

To maintain the same standard of living:

$85,843
$75K in Los Angeles โ†’ San Francisco
$65,526
$75K in San Francisco โ†’ Los Angeles

See exact take-home pay: California salaries ยท California salaries

Living in Los Angeles vs San Francisco

Housing is typically the biggest factor in any cost-of-living comparison. Los Angeles has a housing index of 262 while San Francisco sits at 327 (national average = 100). The median home in Los Angeles costs $850,000 compared to $1,200,000 in San Francisco, a difference of $350,000. Monthly rent follows a similar pattern: $2,700 in Los Angeles versus $3,400 in San Francisco.

Groceries and everyday expenses show a notable difference: Los Angeles scores 107 while San Francisco scores 112.

Healthcare costs in Los Angeles (103) are lower than San Francisco (113).

Median household income in Los Angeles is $65,290 compared to $119,136 in San Francisco. When adjusted for cost of living, income goes further in Los Angeles.

๐Ÿ”— Related Tools

๐Ÿ“š Moving & Relocation Resources

Moving Planners โ†’Finance Books โ†’Budget Planners โ†’

Amazon affiliate links