Side-by-side cost of living comparison for 2026
44% cheaper
Minneapolis is 44% more affordable than San Francisco. A $75,000 salary in San Francisco is equivalent to $41,842 in Minneapolis.
Index values shown. National average = 100. Lower is cheaper.
To maintain the same standard of living:
See exact take-home pay: Minnesota salaries · California salaries
Housing is typically the biggest factor in any cost-of-living comparison. Minneapolis has a housing index of 112 while San Francisco sits at 327 (national average = 100). The median home in Minneapolis costs $310,000 compared to $1,200,000 in San Francisco, a difference of $890,000. Monthly rent follows a similar pattern: $1,500 in Minneapolis versus $3,400 in San Francisco.
Groceries and everyday expenses show a notable difference: Minneapolis scores 104 while San Francisco scores 112.
Healthcare costs in Minneapolis (105) are lower than San Francisco (113).
Median household income in Minneapolis is $64,285 compared to $119,136 in San Francisco. When adjusted for cost of living, income goes further in Minneapolis.
Amazon affiliate links