๐Ÿ“Š Cost of Living Comparison

San Francisco vs Springfield

Side-by-side cost of living comparison for 2026

San Francisco

California
190
Very Expensive
$1,200,000
Median Home
$3,400/mo
Median Rent
$119,136
Median Income

Springfield

Massachusetts
107
Above Average
$230,000
Median Home
$1,200/mo
Median Rent
$41,612
Median Income

๐Ÿ’ก The Verdict

44% cheaper
Springfield is 44% more affordable than San Francisco. A $75,000 salary in San Francisco is equivalent to $42,237 in Springfield.

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values shown. National average = 100. Lower is cheaper.

Housing
327
San Francisc
106
Springfield
Groceries
112
San Francisc
104
Springfield
Utilities
126
San Francisc
119
Springfield
Transportation
113
San Francisc
101
Springfield
Healthcare
113
San Francisc
114
Springfield

๐Ÿ’ฐ Salary Equivalence

To maintain the same standard of living:

$42,237
$75K in San Francisco โ†’ Springfield
$133,178
$75K in Springfield โ†’ San Francisco

See exact take-home pay: California salaries ยท Massachusetts salaries

Living in San Francisco vs Springfield

Housing is typically the biggest factor in any cost-of-living comparison. San Francisco has a housing index of 327 while Springfield sits at 106 (national average = 100). The median home in San Francisco costs $1,200,000 compared to $230,000 in Springfield, a difference of $970,000. Monthly rent follows a similar pattern: $3,400 in San Francisco versus $1,200 in Springfield.

Groceries and everyday expenses show a notable difference: San Francisco scores 112 while Springfield scores 104.

Healthcare costs in San Francisco (113) are lower than Springfield (114).

Median household income in San Francisco is $119,136 compared to $41,612 in Springfield. When adjusted for cost of living, income goes further in Springfield.

๐Ÿ”— Related Tools

๐Ÿ“š Moving & Relocation Resources

Moving Planners โ†’Finance Books โ†’Budget Planners โ†’

Amazon affiliate links