๐Ÿ“Š Cost of Living Comparison

San Francisco vs Stockton

Side-by-side cost of living comparison for 2026

San Francisco

California
190
Very Expensive
$1,200,000
Median Home
$3,400/mo
Median Rent
$119,136
Median Income

Stockton

California
114
Above Average
$400,000
Median Home
$1,500/mo
Median Rent
$54,658
Median Income

๐Ÿ’ก The Verdict

40% cheaper
Stockton is 40% more affordable than San Francisco. A $75,000 salary in San Francisco is equivalent to $45,000 in Stockton.

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values shown. National average = 100. Lower is cheaper.

Housing
327
San Francisc
126
Stockton
Groceries
112
San Francisc
101
Stockton
Utilities
126
San Francisc
108
Stockton
Transportation
113
San Francisc
111
Stockton
Healthcare
113
San Francisc
101
Stockton

๐Ÿ’ฐ Salary Equivalence

To maintain the same standard of living:

$45,000
$75K in San Francisco โ†’ Stockton
$125,000
$75K in Stockton โ†’ San Francisco

See exact take-home pay: California salaries ยท California salaries

Living in San Francisco vs Stockton

Housing is typically the biggest factor in any cost-of-living comparison. San Francisco has a housing index of 327 while Stockton sits at 126 (national average = 100). The median home in San Francisco costs $1,200,000 compared to $400,000 in Stockton, a difference of $800,000. Monthly rent follows a similar pattern: $3,400 in San Francisco versus $1,500 in Stockton.

Groceries and everyday expenses show a notable difference: San Francisco scores 112 while Stockton scores 101.

Healthcare costs in San Francisco (113) are higher than Stockton (101).

Median household income in San Francisco is $119,136 compared to $54,658 in Stockton. When adjusted for cost of living, income goes further in Stockton.

๐Ÿ”— Related Tools

๐Ÿ“š Moving & Relocation Resources

Moving Planners โ†’Finance Books โ†’Budget Planners โ†’

Amazon affiliate links