๐Ÿ“Š Cost of Living Comparison

San Francisco vs Worcester

Side-by-side cost of living comparison for 2026

San Francisco

California
190
Very Expensive
$1,200,000
Median Home
$3,400/mo
Median Rent
$119,136
Median Income

Worcester

Massachusetts
125
Expensive
$340,000
Median Home
$1,600/mo
Median Rent
$52,228
Median Income

๐Ÿ’ก The Verdict

34% cheaper
Worcester is 34% more affordable than San Francisco. A $75,000 salary in San Francisco is equivalent to $49,342 in Worcester.

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values shown. National average = 100. Lower is cheaper.

Housing
327
San Francisc
152
Worcester
Groceries
112
San Francisc
106
Worcester
Utilities
126
San Francisc
122
Worcester
Transportation
113
San Francisc
103
Worcester
Healthcare
113
San Francisc
115
Worcester

๐Ÿ’ฐ Salary Equivalence

To maintain the same standard of living:

$49,342
$75K in San Francisco โ†’ Worcester
$114,000
$75K in Worcester โ†’ San Francisco

See exact take-home pay: California salaries ยท Massachusetts salaries

Living in San Francisco vs Worcester

Housing is typically the biggest factor in any cost-of-living comparison. San Francisco has a housing index of 327 while Worcester sits at 152 (national average = 100). The median home in San Francisco costs $1,200,000 compared to $340,000 in Worcester, a difference of $860,000. Monthly rent follows a similar pattern: $3,400 in San Francisco versus $1,600 in Worcester.

Groceries and everyday expenses show a notable difference: San Francisco scores 112 while Worcester scores 106.

Healthcare costs in San Francisco (113) are lower than Worcester (115).

Median household income in San Francisco is $119,136 compared to $52,228 in Worcester. When adjusted for cost of living, income goes further in Worcester.

๐Ÿ”— Related Tools

๐Ÿ“š Moving & Relocation Resources

Moving Planners โ†’Finance Books โ†’Budget Planners โ†’

Amazon affiliate links